![]() When it comes to the dilemma of South African landfills running out of space, all relevant role players must acknowledge the significant impact of the construction industry. According to Mpendulo Ginindza, President of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA), many local landfills are filled with construction waste rather than household waste. “In spite of the fact that recycling construction waste is more expensive ánd it takes up more space in landfills, in some cases waste service providers don't pay more to dispose of it. We really need to pay attention to our landfills and find new and different ways to dispose of this kind of rubble.” Enforcement, rather than legislation, is the crux Ginindza defines construction waste as rubble, like broken concrete, ceramics, wood, metals, and bricks, and construction debris, which includes tiles, plaster, roof material, doors, and pipes. "Construction waste generally consists of materials used to build and then becomes waste during demolition or renovation of buildings, roads, bridges, and other similar structures. It is all considered debris." She further explains that construction waste is heavier, bulkier, and takes up more space than other sorts of waste, primarily household waste, which is a significant problem. Despite the use of modern waste management technologies, Ginindza asserts that landfilling is still South Africa's most dependable waste management option at the moment. “But when not properly managed, landfills provide a number of health problems to local communities through air pollution, leachate outbreaks, vectors carrying diseases, and odorous gas. There are already quite a few landfills that don't meet the minimum standards. The South African waste legislation is adequate; it is the application and enforcement that seem to be a challenge.“But what do countries that get it right do differently? And how can South Africa learn from them? "They have a separate landfill for construction waste and there are reuse options for the debris to reduce what goes to the landfill," Ginindza says. "They also have screening or sorting facilities on site, and sorting can also be done at the source." Focus on Now and Future Ginindza says South Africa should start with a focus on both short and long-term solutions. “An immediate change would be to separate general waste from construction waste. To create permanent change, role players need to explore reuse options, to then reduce the amount of waste that is landfilled.” She adds that while it is true that landfill airspace appears to be decreasing throughout South Africa, major changes cannot be made to the current waste system. That means the only real solution would be through consistent and gradual changes. “The first step would be using smart technical knowledge and approaches to maximize airspace. Waste should be diverted for fast, practical gains. This can be done by increasing the efficiency of the current landfill systems, using dynamic compaction techniques, researching different expansion levels, finding alternate waste diversion methods, and choosing appropriate waste-to-resources programs." Ginindza concludes by emphasising that the construction industry produces a lot of waste and that it needs to recognize that it has a significant role to play in resource management. “They need to support the waste industry by fostering the principles of 3Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle.” ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa
0 Comments
![]() As vaping grows in popularity, unfortunately so does the harm it causes to the environment. It is especially trendy amongst younger users, though many seem to be unaware that vapes are actually electronic waste, cautions Patricia Schröder, Vice President at The Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). Toxin leaks due to incorrect disposal can be hazardous A "vape," or electronic cigarette, is a device that heats up a liquid to create a vapor that the user then inhales. Since they have a heating element and lithium-ion batteries, vapes are considered e-waste. But vape waste disposal is a big undertaking, because of the many chemicals and materials that are used in them. “Despite the challenges, the correct vape disposal is absolutely crucial. After all, it keeps toxic substances and dangerous liquids out of general landfills,” explains Schröder. “Even in the form of residues, these toxins can leak into natural habitats and river systems, where they can eventually contaminate our freshwater sources.” She says these dangerous elements can, however, be kept out of the environment by recycling and good product management. “Additionally, the materials, including the harmful components, can be recovered for use in other applications.” Informed users are responsible users Schröder notes that all electronic waste was banned from landfills in August 2021. “And due to the fact that vape cartridges contain both electronic components and packaging, they are included in this legislation. However, there is definitely still a need for greater acceptance and understanding on the part of both manufacturers and consumers.” She says vapers should ensure their disposable cartridges are collected through a “Mandatory Take Back-program” and then delivered to a recycling facility for environmentally sound management of the waste and to recover resources. “Return the used vape cartridges to the merchants who sold them, and preferably, only support vendors that will properly manage the vape cartridges and have proof of this,” she elaborates. “Under no circumstance dispose of your vape cartridges in normal waste bins as these go to general landfill and will cause pollution of this environment.” According to Schröder, so-called “end-of-life care” and recycling of vape goods are specialised tasks that call for very specific technology, expertise, and management approaches. “It is the only way we can ensure environmentally sound management that does not adversely affect the environment or the handlers of the waste products.” ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Disposable Nappies take centuries to disintegrate - A Call for Action to Manufacturers and Consumers4/7/2022 ![]() In a landfill, a single disposable diaper can take 200 to 500 years to disintegrate. “With South Africa already facing a challenge of running out of landfill site airspace, the local production and sale of about 1.4 billion diapers per year should be of huge concern,” warns Mpendulo Ginindza, Vice President of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). “A child using disposable diapers is believed to produce up to 900 kg of nappy waste in the first two years of life.” Ginindza contends that consumers, who are increasingly moving away from single-use plastic items like straws and bags, should also acknowledge that nappies are made of single-use plastic. "These disposable diapers' production and disposal leave a large carbon footprint. Their manufacturing involves crude oil, water, and wood pulp." She adds that when they are disposed of improperly, diapers that are left lying around expose children, waste collectors, and animals to them. “It is often misleading to claim on the label that disposable diapers are "biodegradable" or "eco-disposable ''. These nappies typically include mixed materials which require different environments in order to degrade; they cannot do so in a landfill. They cannot be thrown away in a standard compost bin either. " The resulting impact on health and the environment, Ginindza cautions, is huge. The role of diaper manufacturers in EPR The legal criteria for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) came into effect in May 2021. “These requirements put back the responsibility on paper, packaging and single-use product manufacturers and importers to assume responsibility for the complete life of the products they generate,” Ginindza explains. “Yet it is tricky to say where nappy manufacturers fall within these categories. Most often, they are considered as producers of hygiene products.” However, diapers are made, confined, and wrapped in plastic in bulk packaging. As a result, their contributions will be needed if EPR is to succeed. “We are still in the early days of implementation of these requirements. All stakeholders are working hard to understand and implement these requirements,” Ginindza says. Small consumer actions can make a world of difference By making conscious decisions regarding disposal, consumers can make a difference. Ginindza says she has two suggestions for those who don’t know where to start. “Consumers could perhaps consider adopting reusable nappies part-time,” she suggests. “We cannot deny that there is a valid or reasonable need for disposable nappies. They are sometimes used for sick or elderly people to help keep them clean. However, we can normalise modern cloth diapers and promote reusable diapers in a positive way.” She continues by saying that there is a lot of assistance available from senior family members and online tutorial videos to help families get to grips with reusable nappies. “Secondly, we have to work towards separation at source to help control odors and downstream safety, health and environmental risks.” In conclusion, Ginindza notes that consumers do not need to aim to be perfect at doing all of this. “Millions of people making imperfect changes can and will make a difference.” ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Though South Africa does not have any formal statistics on its available landfill airspace, those in the waste management industry agree that it is rapidly filling up - and that the country is on the verge of a crisis.
“We had pretty well-run facilities around the year 2000, but our landfill sites are currently in a terrible state; the worst they've been in decades,” warns Leon Grobbelaar, past president of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). “Until South Africa has a formal policy to ‘reduce, reuse and recycle, we will continue to fill up our landfill air space at this frightening rate.” The main culprits: Lack of Enforcement and Future Planning According to Grobbelaar, the problem is a complex one with numerous contributing elements - but legislation isn’t one of them. He points out that South Africa has some of the best waste management legislation in the world. "We incorporated knowledge from other successful countries into our legal framework, which took the form of the local National Environmental Management Waste Act." NEMWA The issue, he explains, is that this legislation is not being enforced. "The South African Waste Information System, or SAWIS, is one example. Users are supposed to submit reports on the tonnages of waste generated, recycled and disposed of to that system, but they don't because they know there are no repercussions.” Grobbelaar goes on to say that a lack of future planning will soon be one of the major concerns that towns and cities will have to deal with. "They are responsible for providing services for citizens to dispose of their waste, thus they are obligated to develop additional landfills. However, municipalities in South Africa simply do not have the means or capacity to do so." The last time the cities of Johannesburg and Tshwane have licensed or constructed a new landfill, was in the late 1980’s and early 1990's, Grobbelaar says - and now they are filling up at an alarming rate. "However, the licensing and construction process for a new landfill typically takes three to five years. followed by appeals and possible legal processes. So, even if our major cities opted to start this process tomorrow, we won't have new facilities until approximately 2030." Small actions add up to make a difference Though the problem may feel overwhelming, individual actions can make a difference. "First and foremost, we should all be very conscious of what we put in our 'black waste bag'," Grobbelaar points out. "We should have a two-bag system, with one for dry items and the other for wet materials." Glass, tin, paper, and plastic (Recyclables) are among the items that should be put out for our informal waste pickers - the so-called 'trolley brigade' - to recover. “The second bag should be for ‘wet waste’. This includes the waste we generate in the kitchen, such as fruits, vegetable peels, and leftovers. It has the potential to contaminate dry waste and has no real market value." Grobbelaar urges consumers to also ensure they don’t mix garden greens with domestic waste, as garden greens can be shredded and composted. “If you are unsure of where you can dispose of your recyclables, garden greens or builders rubble waste , you can contact the IWMSA who will gladly assist and point you in the right direction." ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Food insecurity has increased in South Africa since the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to figures from late 2020, 9.34 million people (16% of the total population) faced the spectre of hunger, even though South Africa is an exporter of food. The sad truth is that an unacceptably high percentage of the food produced in the country goes to waste, says Brendon Jewaskiewitz, President of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). “A prosperous and stable country is impossible if so many people don’t have enough food. In a developing country like South Africa, ensuring food security is ultimately a hot political issue,” he says. “Quite simply, we need to ensure that all South Africans have enough to eat, and that begins with reducing the amount of food that is wasted.” Reducing food wastage is one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12.3 is to halve global food waste per capita by 2050, and to reduce food losses along production and supply chains. Clearly, reduction in food waste relates directly to SDG 2, Zero Hunger. South Africa’s food sector signed on to a voluntary food loss and waste agreement brokered by the Consumer Goods Council, Department of Trade, Industry & Competition, and the Department of the Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, and which has the same goal as SDG 12.3. Research published by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in 2021 estimates that 10.3 million tonnes of food is lost or wasted annually in South Africa. This equates to 34.3% of local production, or 45% when one takes exports into account. The largest proportion (49%) is lost during processing and manufacture, with 8% lost during primary production and 19% lost during post-harvest handling and storage. As much as 18% of total food waste occurs at the household and general consumer level. This means that almost one fifth of what we purchase ends up in the rubbish bin. Mr Jewaskiewitz says that food wastage is serious not just because it reduces the amount of food available for consumption—it has severe environmental consequences as well. While some food waste is used as animal feed, the vast majority finds its way into landfills where it generates large amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas some 22 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Decaying food and organic matter can also pollute ground and surface water reserves. One must also take into account the pollution created along the whole food value chain, including fertiliser use, machinery and vehicles emitting gases, and packaging. Reducing food waste will also mean that the world will not have to produce so much extra food to supply the needs of burgeoning populations, particularly in Africa and Asia. Increased agriculture will mean more loss of biodiversity and higher levels of emissions. “Role players across the value chain are using IT and related technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning to predict demand more accurately and improve production, handling and storage processes,” Mr Jewaskiewitz concludes. “Consumers can also play a significant part by shopping and planning better to minimise the food that they waste”. “We need to change our mindset as a society to target food wastage as part of our broader drive to eliminate hunger and care for our planet.” ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: Home (iwmsa.co.za) Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Do you smile as you hold up your newly purchased garment? Then frown at the offending plastic wrapper it came in? Everyone knows plastic is bad for the planet. But what about the garment itself?
"Textile and fast-fashion waste is a huge problem that's growing exponentially but gets far less attention than it deserves," says Brendon Jewaskiewitz, President of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). It's high time consumers knew the truth – fashion is stripping the planet bare. It's almost impossible to recycle and its waste costs a fortune to process. Global trends According to Jewaskiewitz, the global textiles industry generates some 92 million tonnes of waste annually, about 4% of the world's total waste volume. That equates to a rubbish truck of clothing every second. By 2030, the figure is predicted to be in excess of 134 million tonnes. Production problems Textile and clothing production are extremely energy intensive processes that contribute significantly to air pollution. These industries are reported to be responsible for about 10 percent of global carbon emissions. Textile mills are also to blame for one fifth of the world's industrial water pollution, or 20 percent of water waste. This is from using over 20,000 chemicals, some of which are carcinogenic (cancer-causing) substances. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Don't forget the secondary waste created from production, manufacturing, packaging, transporting, marketing and retailing fabrics and clothing. Waste management Disposing of fashion and textile waste creates even more problems. "Consumers think everything can be magically recycled but, in reality, very little fashion waste is recyclable," says Jewaskiewitz. Recycling old clothing is very slow and labour intensive, and requires special skills, often making it too costly to be worth the effort. A single garment can be made of various materials, some not recyclable, that must be carefully dismantled and separated. Mechanical recycling can also damage fibres, making fabrics unfit for reuse. Most old clothing made from synthetic materials also can't degrade properly. That's why over 85% of discarded clothes are either burned or end up in a landfill. The culprits While population growth is certainly an important factor in the rapidly rising tsunami of fashion waste, it's not the main cause. Jewaskiewitz blames runaway consumerism in the fashion industry. "People are reportedly buying 60% more clothes than they did 15 years ago," he says. That equates to around 56 million tonnes of clothing per year. Why? Fashion used to be seasonal. But fiercely competitive fashion houses are flooding the market with new designs at shorter intervals, enticing trendy shoppers into the latest outfits much quicker. The solution Only conscientious consumers can stop the fashion garbage avalanche that's sweeping the planet, but it means dealing with the problem and not its symptoms. Yes, you can sell, hand down or donate old clothes. Or you can find ways to reuse them, like cutting them into cleaning rags or stuff cushions with them. "The best solution is to opt for longer lasting materials and styles that never go out of fashion, and demand the same from the fashion industry," says Jewaskiewitz. ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: Home (iwmsa.co.za) Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa They’re at work before the crack of dawn until long after most other citizens have gone to bed. And yet waste pickers are viewed as an irritation by many who see them going through their rubbish bins.
“Instead of getting annoyed, people should be thankful for the difference these pickers make in our environment and economy,” says Mpendulo Ginindza, Vice President of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). “According to the CSIR, in 2014 alone the informal pickers saved municipalities between R309 million and R748 million in landfill airspace. This by simply diverting recyclables away from landfills.” According to the Waste Pickers Association, South Africa has more than 90 000 Waste Pickers, and Ginindza says it is estimated that a single picker can divert between 16 and 24 tons each year. “Plastics SA reported in 2018 that the majority of recyclable plastic collected were sourced from formal collectors. Formal collectors typically source their recyclables from waste pickers and buy-and-drop centres.” A day in the life of a waste picker A waste picker is defined as someone who collects reusable and recyclable materials from residential and commercial waste bins, landfill sites and open spaces in order to revalue them and generate an income. Ginindza says she interviewed a female waste picker from Limpopo about her typical day. “She told me competition is rife, and she has to wake up at 4am to be on site by 5am. When she arrives, she sorts the waste and weighs the materials. When there is enough, she transports it to the drop off centre for formal collection.” Whether waste pickers work in a rural or urban environment – the fact remains that this is no easy job. “ They are the first people on the road early in the morning. They sort through bins and carry the heavy waste on their trollies. Often, they don’t have the proper equipment, and environmental conditions are not safe. Not to mention what they come across in the bins.” How can you help? Though the industry itself is regulated, Ginindza points out that many waste pickers are informal workers. “A number of municipalities have attempted to integrate informal workers, but with mixed success rates.” She also points to the Waste Pickers Integration Guideline for South Africa, produced by the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries in 2020. “It provides guidance to municipalities and industry on measures to improve their working conditions.” Legislation also plays a role. “In May 2021, the Extended Producer Responsibility Regulations came into effect. Its purpose is support, recognition and compensation for the work that is done by pickers along the waste value chain,” Ginindza says. But individuals can also assist by making life easier for waste pickers, she adds. “Start by separating your waste at home and at work. Avoid putting dangerous or hazardous items that they may come across when looking for recyclables in your bins. And of course - be more tolerant and patient on the road or on the street the next time you meet a waste picker at work,” she concludes. ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, 060 995 6277, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa The “usual suspects” of plastic pollution by individuals – plastic bags and straws – now have company. Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, disposable masks are lying discarded all over the country. And according to Brendon Jewaskiewitz, President of Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA), the problem is snowballing.
“Studies have shown that globally, about 130 billion disposable masks are being used per month. That equates to an astounding 3 million per minute,” Jewaskiewitz points out. “Although we don’t have exact figures for South Africa, as a nation we are rather careless about single-use plastics – and masks are no exception. With our population of more that 58 million people, we will most certainly be in line with these shocking global statistics.” Not a waste problem - a human problem Jewaskiewitz emphasizes the issue of single-use masks and their disposal can’t be addressed without acknowledging that it is part of a bigger plastic pollution problem, and that human behaviour is at the core of it. “These masks are not biodegradable,” he notes. “When they are exposed to the elements, like sunlight, they break down and fragment into micro- and nanoplastics. It is then spread into our ecosystems and consumed by animals and fish.” He says there has even been instances where small animals have been found entangled in the “ear bands” of discarded masks. Users are therefore advised to snip these ear bands before putting their masks in a PPE-bin. “Many of these issues can be completely avoided by steering clear of single use masks in the first place,” Jewaskiewitz points out. “Opt for a reusable mask whenever it’s possible.” He says single-use masks are often chosen because of convenience. “It’s the same argument we hear with plastic bags. People will say they packed shopping bags, but are too lazy to walk back to their car and fetch it, so they buy a plastic bag instead. Similarly, people now keep a bunch of disposable masks in their car.” Education and awareness is key Simply putting items in a rubbish bin, waiting for it to be discarded by authorities, is also no longer good enough. “In South Africa, local municipalities are tasked with waste management,” Jewaskiewitz says. “But with so many elements of service delivery taking strain, waste management is often shifted to the bottom of the pile when it comes to allocating resources.” The result is that about 90% of local waste is landfilled, and only a very small portion is recycled or reused. “Companies can make a difference by emphasizing the importance of reusable masks, as well as the correct disposal of single-use masks,” he advises. “It should be as important in their communications as the Covid-19 safety protocols.” He says looking at the bigger picture is crucial. “People often think that the one disposable mask they throw away, makes no impact. But if every South African does that every single day, it very quickly turns into a massive problem. “Likewise, if everyone makes an effort to reduce and recycle, it also makes a huge positive difference,” Jewaskiewitz concludes. ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, 060 995 6277, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on IWMSA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Despite the fact that approximately 95% of e-waste can be recycled, recovered or treated and beneficiated, e-recycling is not high on South African’s agenda.
This according to Patricia Schröder, Vice-Chair of the Central branch of the Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa (IWMSA). International e-Waste Day takes place on 14 October and this year’s focus is the role of consumers in improving rates of re-use and recycling. “Local recycling rates are very low and it’s a major problem,” Schröder warns. “For example, only between 2 and 2.5% of waste lighting, and between 10 and 12% of other waste electrical and electronic equipment is recycled.” The most common forms of e-waste include small domestic appliances, household portable batteries, lighting, and IT and communication equipment and consumables, such as printer cartridges. “Big manufacturers were not obligated to play their part voluntarily,” says Schröder. “But in May this year, the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations were published. It makes the manufactures and producers responsible for the end of life management of their products.” The new regulations will be implementable from 5 November 2021. According to Schröder, this will be a starting point to see how effective these regulations will be to improve collection and recycling rates. “Producers must sign up by before 4 November 2021 to one of the various existing industry Producer Responsibility Organisations (PRO’s) to become compliant and take responsibility for their products’ end-of-life management. This will also drive consumer awareness, environmental improvement, innovation, job and skills creation among many other benefits.” She adds that the IWMSA can assist companies with information on becoming compliant with the EPR regulations How to manage corporate and individual e-waste If each individual and business plays their part, it can make a big difference. “Avoid impulse buying of electronic products,” Schröder advises. “Ask yourself: Do I really need this item? “Buy items that are recyclable and check the labelling. Repair and re-use all items to extend the lifespan of the product. At the end of the lifespan or when the product is not required any longer, ensure that you drop off your e-waste at collection sites where available; or find a Department of Environmental Affairs-legally compliant, licensed recycling facility for environmentally sound management.” Businesses should also insist on compliance documentation for traceability and auditing purposes. “If these services are contracted out, ensure that your contractors are following the correct chain of custody for compliance.” She warns buyers mustn’t be tempted by illicit unlicensed traders or companies that pay a small fee for the items and claim to recycle them. “All they do is pick out the valuable fractions with negative environmental impacts to sell to the highest bidder - like scrap dealers or illegal or unethical e-waste dealers - and the balance is then illegally discarded with general waste,” she explains. “And don’t support organisations that charge you to “smash” your e-waste in a room to vent your frustrations. Not only is this practice a health, safety and environmental risk, but these smashed items are usually illegally discarded,” Schröder concludes. ENDS MEDIA CONTACT: Rosa-Mari Le Roux, 060 995 6277, rosa-mari@thatpoint.co.za, www.atthatpoint.co.za For more information on PASA please visit: Website: http://www.iwmsa.co.za/ Twitter: @IWMSA LinkedIn: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa Facebook: Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories
All
|