At That Point
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • our take on AI
  • your resources

Remuneration committees need independent advisors

22/5/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Recent reports of shareholders voting against executive remuneration structures have again highlighted the need for increased transparency in the disclosure of not only the amounts paid, but how the amounts were calculated and the link to performance. Many companies have made significant progress with the disclosure of executive pay and the quality and content of remuneration policies and implementation reports.

However, the improved transparency of certain excessive executive pay packages has also fuelled the perception that all executives are paid exorbitant amounts of money, causing an ever increasing pay gap.

Laurence Grubb, Master Reward Specialist and executive committee member of the South African Reward Association (SARA), says a handful of executives are still able to manipulate remuneration committees, despite notable efforts to follow the principles set out in King IV and the association’s guidelines.

Committees agree to targets which are a little too soft or potential remuneration that is out of line with industry. “Although these executives are in the minority, it remains a concern and needs to be contained.”

Independent advice needed
Grubb says remuneration committees should be entitled to obtain independent advice from their own remuneration consultants to validate what has been presented to them by the executives. The cost for this service should be borne by the company.

SARA published guidelines on the drafting of a remuneration policy and the implementation report at the beginning of the year which follows the principles set out in King IV.

Some ‘old’ long term incentive schemes may have awards which were not linked to performance. Those shares may now be vesting, and with no performance linked to them, it is quite possible that shareholders will vote against such schemes.

Grubb says companies need to confirm the performance criteria for vesting before making any awards for long term incentives. Failing to do so, will undoubtedly annoy shareholders.

Barclays Africa experienced this first hand when shareholders voted against the company’s policy and implementation report earlier this month (May 2018).  

In terms of the King IV principle on remuneration, the policy should record the measures that the board commits to when 25% of the votes are exercised against either the remuneration policy or the implementation report, or both. These actions should then be communicated in the background statement in the following year.

South Africa is the only country in which the threshold for these remedial measures is as low as 25%. In Australia, the UK and Belgium, among others, remedial measures are only mandated if 50% or more of the votes are cast against the remuneration policy and implementation report.

Pay gap realities
The pay gap in South Africa remains a burning issue, although companies have been trying to address it by offering larger annual increases for lower level workers and smaller increases at executive level.

However, an increase of 5% on R2 million will always make a bigger gap than 8% on R100, 000. Several companies have also introduced the minimum wage, and in some instances, wages which exceed the minimum wage.

In countries where the pay gap is much narrower, the level of skills, education and productivity of the lower end workers are much higher than in South Africa.

Grubb says companies operating in those countries are typically able to pay much higher rates to their lower level employees because of the higher skills and productivity levels.
“Unfortunately, in countries where education is severally limited and not at the right standard, the impact is felt mostly by those whose skills and level of education do not offer them the opportunity to increase their earning potential.”

Companies find it difficult to continually pay higher salaries to lower levels and, inevitably where that does happen, there are job losses.

0 Comments

Eskom executive bonuses vs in work poverty - who is right?

28/6/2016

0 Comments

 
PictureDr Mark Bussin, Executive Committee member of SARA
Recent reports of Eskom executives awarding themselves R6 million bonus per person from a pool of R1.7bn has left a sour taste in the mouths of The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM). However, according to Dr Mark Bussin, exco member of the South African Reward Association (SARA), there are always two sides to a story.

The trade unions are facing members on a daily basis regarding how tough it is to come out on one’s salary. “I think it is the next big wave to hit us – in work poverty (IWP). It affects more than half our workforce. People are struggling to come out on their salaries and they don’t understand what executives do to earn their millions. It causes resentment and anger amongst workers and creates a platform for radical elements, radical political parties and radical politicians,” says Dr Bussin.

On the other hand, executives are under continual scrutiny, pressure, risk and forever increasing fiduciary responsibility. It is governance and onerous fiduciary duties that drives executive pay up and up. In Eskom’s case, they do run their business as a business should be run. However, with political interference setting unrealistic political goals and targets, it can put Eskom into the red. This is not entirely the Executive’s fault. Their original budget showed a profit, but the politicians, for example, instructed the electrification of several voter areas and they made a loss – not exactly their fault.

“However, as right as the bonuses seem to the Eskom executives, there is a new word that I have coined called – the “optics” of remuneration. With rotating executives, blackouts, Medupi and general negative press – the optics don’t seem right to earn millions in bonus. This calls for wisdom and sensitivity on the part of Eskom executives. Accepting the millions is contentious and should be declined. Regardless of how lawful or technically correct the bonus calculation is. The optics aren’t right.”

ENDS
​

MEDIA CONTACT: Cathlen Fourie, 012 644 2833, [email protected], www.atthatpoint.co.za  

For more information on SARA please visit:
Website: www.sara.co.za  
Twitter: @SA_reward
LinkedIn: South African Reward Association
Facebook: SARA – South African Reward Association ​

0 Comments
    Welcome to the SARA newsroom. 

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    March 2023
    February 2023
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Welcome to the South African Reward Association newsroom.

    Categories

    All
    2016 SARA Reward Awards
    2016 South African Reward Association Conference
    2021 SARA Reward Awards
    2024 SARA Reward Awards
    4IR
    ABSA
    Agile Remuneration
    AI
    André Daniels
    Anglo AMerican
    Annual Salary Increase
    Artificial Intelligence
    Benefits
    Board
    Bridgestone
    Career
    Career Growth
    Carmen Arico
    CCMA
    Chris Blair
    Companies Amendment Act 16 Of 2024
    Compensation
    Corruption
    Covid 19
    Covid-19
    CPI
    Cyber-attacks
    Cybersecurity
    Deon Smit
    Digital
    Disruption
    Diverste Needs
    Dr Mark Bussin
    Dr Ronel Nienaber
    Economic Growth
    Economy
    Education
    Employee
    Employee Empowerment
    Employee Engagement
    Employee Experience Management
    Employee Performance Management
    Employees
    Employers
    Employment
    Employment Equity Act
    Equal-pay-for-work-of-equal-value
    Equity
    Executive Bonuses
    Executive Pay
    Executive Remuneration
    Fair Pay
    Female Employees
    Financial And Non Financial Rewards
    Financial And Non-financial Rewards
    Fixed Pay
    Flexibility
    FNB
    Four-day Work Week
    GDP
    Gender Inequality
    Gender Pay Gap
    Generation Z
    Gen Z
    Global Workforce
    Goldfields
    Governance
    Holistic Total Awards
    HR
    Human Recources
    Incentives
    Inequality
    Inflation
    International Mobility
    Janine O’Riley
    Jerry Botha
    Job Retention
    Job Security
    Job Seekers
    Kevan Hawley
    Khokhela Consulting
    Kim Lombard
    King IV
    Kirk Kruger
    Labour Relations Act
    Laurence Grubb
    Lindiwe Sebesho
    Living Wage
    Marie Claire Mclachlan
    Marie-Claire Mclachlan
    Martin Hopkins
    Mental Wellness
    Millennials
    Minimum Wage
    Morag Phillips
    Mr Price Group
    MTN
    Muhammed Goolab
    MultiChoice
    Multi-generational Workforce
    Nazlie Samodien
    Negotiating Salary
    Nicol Mullins
    Openserve
    Parental Leave
    Pay Discrepancies
    Pay Gap
    Peet Kruger
    Performance-based Remuneration
    Performance Management
    Personal Development
    PwC
    RemCo
    Remote Working
    Remuneration
    Remuneration Policies
    Remuneration Resolutions
    Remuneration Voting
    Reward Awards
    Rewards
    Reward Systems
    Salary
    Salary Increase
    Salary Negotiation
    SARA
    SARA Conference 2015
    SARA Conference 2020
    Shareholder Votes
    Skill-based Pay
    Slilled
    South African Reward Association
    Standard Bank
    Talent
    Technology
    Termination Pay
    The South African Reserve Bank
    Total Reward Internship Programme
    Total Reward Package
    Total Rewards Model
    Total Reward Strategy
    UIF
    Vaccination
    Variable Pay
    Wage Freeze
    Wage Negotiations
    WFH
    Women In Business
    Women's Day
    Women's Month 2024
    Workers
    Workforce
    WorldatWork
    World Of Work
    Yolanda Sedlmaier
    Zondo Report
    Zuma

    RSS Feed

CONTACT US

office [at] atthatpoint [dot] co [dot] za
© COPYRIGHT 2025
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • our take on AI
  • your resources