At That Point
  • home
  • services
  • about us
  • our work
  • our thoughts

Time to rethink the golden parachute?

4/10/2016

0 Comments

 

Companies need to reconsider the way they handle CEO terminations
​

Picture
Executive pay is a hot topic for shareholder and stakeholder activists, but nothing gets everybody’s blood pumping faster than a CEO who walks away from a disastrous performance with a substantial golden parachute. “Companies need to reconsider the way they handle CEO terminations to avoid arousing controversy and appearing to pay for failure,” says Martin Hopkins, Executive Committee Member at the South African Reward Association (SARA) and a partner at PWC in the People & Organisation practice.
 
For example, in 2011, executives at Hewlett-Packard, Bank of New York Mellon, Burger King and Yahoo were asked to step down and received a combined $60 million in severance packages. Hewlett-Packard’s Leo Apotheker alone received a whopping $13.2 million in cash and stock severance.  Recently, a prominent South African company paid its CEO a golden handshake in excess of R20 million following a disastrous event on his watch .
 
“We must recognise that there may be sound commercial reasons why companies take the pragmatic course of essentially paying a CEO to leave, but it is not recommended from a governance point of view because it sends the wrong message to staff and shareholders, and severs the vital link between pay and performance,” Hopkins says.
 
Principles 161 to 163 of King III make it clear that an executive who is terminated because of poor performance should suffer financial consequences in order to support a “balanced and fair remuneration policy”. Based on its draft, King IV, due to be released by the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa on 1 November 2016, will take a similar line.
 
Well-defined process required to dismiss CEO for non-performance
It is important to recognise that the issue of CEO termination pay-outs is not necessarily as clear-cut as it may initially seem. One factor to consider is that South African labour law is extremely employee-friendly; dismissing a CEO for non-performance would require a proper process to be followed. It is likely to take between one and two years to dismiss a CEO, during which time the company would be disadvantaged by having no proper leadership.
 
“It’s a process that would necessarily involve lawyers and intense media scrutiny with all the reputational and other risks that implies,” Hopkins says. “You can see why it would make business sense to shut that particular circus down, and avoid a prolonged, public washing of dirty corporate linen.”
 
Legal factors to consider
Another factor is that CEOs who are dismissed would in any event be entitled to substantial pay-outs in terms of the law. A termination package would at a minimum include notice pay, and CEO notice periods are longer than those for lesser employees—six months is best practice—plus two weeks’ salary for every year worked. Share awards that have not yet vested would also be paid out on a pro-rated basis.
 
Frequently, the notice pay would be subsumed within a “loss-of-office” payment which, while not mandated, is generally considered reasonable. Hopkins says that around one year’s salary is considered acceptable.
 
“In other words, a CEO who is being dismissed or asked to leave would anyway be leaving with a substantial sum of money based on perfectly legitimate grounds. But what must be avoided is any implication that executives are not subject to the same strictures as other employees, who are penalised for poor performance. Such perceptions damage the notion that the company is run fairly, and break down the trust that is essential for sustainable profitability. It also means that successful executives who are moving on prematurely for other reasons, are by implication tarred with the same brush.
 
“All employees, including CEOs, need to be treated fairly but it may be time for companies to bite the bullet and go through due legal disciplinary processes leading to dismissal in the case of poor performance of senior executives,” Hopkins concludes.

ENDS
​

MEDIA CONTACT: Cathlen Fourie, 082 222 9198, cathlen@thatpoint.co.za, www.atthatpoint.co.za  

For more information on SARA please visit:
Website: www.sara.co.za  
Twitter: @SA_reward
LinkedIn: South African Reward Association
Facebook: SARA – South African Reward Association ​​​​​​​​​

0 Comments

City of Cape Town pay-outs: transparency will be critical

26/8/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Media reports are currently questioning the appropriateness, and even legality, of mooted payments to terminate the contracts to two City of Cape Town executives. Details are still sketchy, but it appears that councillors were being asked to consider the payments, which run into millions, in a closed-door session last night. 

“Juicy press stories aside, we need to keep an open mind on the topic until there is greater clarity on what actually is going on,” says Dr Mark Bussin, Executive Committee Member at the South African Reward Association (SARA) and Chairman of 21st Century . “However, there are some important principles that should inform the debate.”

One is that King III makes it clear that it is undesirable to pay out executives accused of misdemeanours or underperformance just to get rid of them. If executives don’t perform to expectation, or are accused of wrongdoing, they should not be paid (paragraphs 161 and 162 under Principle 2.25). Of course, companies frequently make use of this approach to avoid the reputational and legal fallout from a dispute, but it contradicts the principle that executives should be remunerated fairly and responsibly. 

In this case, there is no indication that these particular payments were made to get rid of the executives for these reasons. Rather, according to a report in the Cape Times, the move was being made in pursuance of the City’s Organisation Development and Transformation Plan, which is a legislative requirement. 

“If the two contracts are being terminated simply in order to make way for appointments in line with the Plan; for example, affirmative action appointments, then the motivation for the pay-outs seems understandable and, in the broader scheme of things, the amounts do not look excessive,” says Dr Bussin. “However, this is public money so it is critical that the procedure followed to arrive at the amounts is both fair and transparent—any suggestion of a cover-up, no matter if it’s unwarranted, will give rise to speculation. Hopefully, the mayor will issue a comprehensive statement sooner rather than later.”

ENDS
​

MEDIA CONTACT: Cathlen Fourie, 012 644 2833, cathlen@thatpoint.co.za, www.atthatpoint.co.za  

For more information on SARA please visit:
Website: www.sara.co.za  
Twitter: @SA_reward
LinkedIn: South African Reward Association
Facebook: SARA – South African Reward Association ​​​​​​

0 Comments

    Archives

    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Welcome to the South African Reward Association newsroom.

    Categories

    All
    2016 SARA Reward Awards
    2016 South African Reward Association Conference
    ABSA
    Chris Blair
    Deon Smit
    Dr Mark Bussin
    Dr Ronel Nienaber
    Economic Growth
    Employee Empowerment
    Employee Engagement
    Employee Performance Management
    Executive Bonuses
    Executive Pay
    Executive Remuneration
    Female Employees
    Financial And Non Financial Rewards
    Financial And Non-financial Rewards
    Fixed Pay
    FNB
    Gender Pay Gap
    Global Workforce
    Incentives
    International Mobility
    Jerry Botha
    Job Security
    Job Seekers
    Kevan Hawley
    Khokhela Consulting
    Kim Lombard
    King IV
    Laurence Grubb
    Lindiwe Sebesho
    Living Wage
    Marie Claire Mclachlan
    Marie-Claire Mclachlan
    Martin Hopkins
    Minimum Wage
    Morag Phillips
    MTN
    Nazlie Samodien
    Negotiating Salary
    Nicol Mullins
    Pay Discrepancies
    Peet Kruger
    PwC
    Remuneration Resolutions
    Reward Awards
    Reward Systems
    SARA
    SARA Conference 2015
    SARA Conference 2020
    Shareholder Votes
    Standard Bank
    Technology
    Termination Pay
    Total Reward Internship Programme
    Total Reward Package
    Total Rewards Model
    Total Reward Strategy
    UIF
    Variable Pay
    Wage Freeze
    Wage Negotiations
    Women In Business
    WorldatWork
    Zuma

    RSS Feed

CONTACT US

office [at] atthatpoint [dot] co [dot] za
© COPYRIGHT 2020
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • home
  • services
  • about us
  • our work
  • our thoughts