At That Point
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • your resources
  • SA Industry News

How to set executive pay: A guide for rewards professionals

17/10/2016

0 Comments

 

By Dr Mark Bussin,
Executive Committee Member, South African Reward Association
and
Chairperson, 21st Century Pay Solutions
​

Picture
Executive pay is a trigger for many media commentators and shareholder activists, but the truth is that remuneration committees (Remcos) have developed several methodologies for tackling what is a very challenging issue. Three main methodologies are used in South Africa where, in general, remuneration governance is on a par with global standards thanks to widespread adoption of the King Codes of Corporate Governance issued by the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa.
 
Each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and reward professionals need to understand them thoroughly in order to make the right choices—particularly as the practice of naming the consultant used by the Remco is gaining traction. It is also worth emphasising that these methodologies are not watertight categories, and reward professionals will typically use elements of more than one methodology to arrive at a recommendation.
 
Market benchmarking
This is by far the most commonly used methodology in South Africa, and has the benefit of being easy to understand and of making intuitive sense. As the name implies, its basic principle is to establish what the CEOs of companies of similar size and complexity are being paid, and to use that figure as the basis for negotiation.
 
In this case, size is important because the job description of the CEO of an international bank will look very similar to that of the CEO of a four-store chain of hardware shops; the difficulty and impact of the respective jobs is clearly related to the relative size and influence of the two companies.
 
Various metrics are used to establish company size, but the most common, and most reliable, are turnover or revenue; nett profit before tax; number of employees and annual salary bill.
 
Other criteria are market capitalisation, geographic footprint and assets. Depending on the particular circumstances, there might be a case for including these last mentioned criteria, but with care. For example, the relative size of asset bases can give a very misleading picture of the difficulty of the CEO’s job. Thus, a company that owns a large amount of fixed infrastructure, such as a road or rail network, might be as large or larger than a multinational financial services company in terms of asset base —but running the latter is a much tougher job than the former, and the potential for loss is much higher.
 
This last point leads onto what is the major drawback of this methodology: it is something of a blunt instrument. Company size says a lot about the complexity and difficulty of the CEO’s job, but not everything. It should thus not be used uncritically.
 
Competitor model
This model also uses peer companies as the basis for setting the parameters of the discussion, and thus the first step has to be identifying suitable companies. The benchmarking methodology described above will obviously be helpful in this regard.
 
Having determined the right companies for comparison, this methodology compares the relative performance of the companies. Thus, a company that performs in the top quartile as compared with its competitors will pay its executives more than those of a similar company in a lower quartile of performers.
 
Obviously, company performance varies dramatically, so this methodology is perhaps most useful when used to determine the performance-related (variable) portion of the executive’s compensation package. Following a mixed model, then, benchmarking might be used to set the executive’s basic salary, while the competitor model forms the basis for establishing his or her incentives and share options.
 
Job-Sizing
This methodology is much more complex than the preceding two, and attempts to enable the reward professional to categorise the executive’s job more finely, and correlate it more closely to the rest of the market, using salary survey data. Many consultants have developed their own versions of this approach—this description will thus be as general as possible in order to identify the principles.
 
Based on research and experience, the methodology establishes the key criteria for evaluating executive positions. My own methodology, Execu-Measure, uses company size, the strategic level of the job, its impact, and its complexity and/ or requirement for problem-solving.
 
The process begins with establishing the magnitude of the job using company size. The criteria would typically correspond to the four listed in the benchmarking model above; the Execu-Measure methodology uses one of the following: number of employees, total assets or total equity/ liabilities.
 
The company sizing is the most heavily weighted factor. Once it is established, it is refined using a granular evaluation of the job itself. Execu-Measure uses three main categories, each with several sub-categories:
  1. Impact of the job (direct, joint or indirect);
  2. Strategic level, or freedom to act. This looks at whether the job is strategic across the whole group or at business-unit/ company level, as well as execution responsibilities; and
  3. Freedom to think in the context of freedom to act. Here, the various categories are a freedom that is abstractly defined, broadly defined or well-defined. 

​All of these factors are weighted and values put into a large matrix, so that a particular job’s metrics can be cross-referenced to a single job level. The job levels correlate to those used in the various salary surveys.Thinking carefully through the methodology that is used is critical because the remuneration policy and implementation need to be defensible. It should further be noted that because there are so many factors involved, as well as the need to exercise judgement, that no formula can simply be applied. At the same time, Remcos and reward professionals should be aware that the executives will, of course, be advocating metrics and criteria that would favour higher rewards for themselves. Remuneration policies and strategies need to be robust.
 
The following guiding principles should inform the remuneration strategy and its implementation:
  1. Tie pay as directly as possible to performance and value delivered to the company;
  2. Use market norms as much as possible, they are a valuable benchmark. However, as noted above, it is necessary to think deeply about what market norms to use in the context of the company’s business; and
  3. Impeccable governance is absolutely essential. 

It is always going to be difficult to get remuneration right, and it is unlikely that everybody will be satisfied. But with the right degree of care and thought, the reward professional can craft something that is fair, that can be defended and that, most important of all, supports the company’s strategic goals.

ENDS
​

MEDIA CONTACT: Cathlen Fourie, 082 222 9198, [email protected], www.atthatpoint.co.za  

For more information on SARA please visit:
Website: www.sara.co.za  
Twitter: @SA_reward
LinkedIn: South African Reward Association
Facebook: SARA – South African Reward Association ​​​​​​​​​

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Welcome to the SARA newsroom. 

    Archives

    May 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    March 2023
    February 2023
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Welcome to the South African Reward Association newsroom.

    Categories

    All
    2016 SARA Reward Awards
    2016 South African Reward Association Conference
    2021 SARA Reward Awards
    2024 SARA Reward Awards
    4IR
    ABSA
    Agile Remuneration
    AI
    André Daniels
    Anglo AMerican
    Annual Salary Increase
    Artificial Intelligence
    Benefits
    Board
    Bridgestone
    Career
    Career Growth
    Carmen Arico
    CCMA
    Chris Blair
    Companies Amendment Act 16 Of 2024
    Compensation
    Corruption
    Covid 19
    Covid-19
    Cyber-attacks
    Cybersecurity
    Deon Smit
    Digital
    Disruption
    Diverste Needs
    Dr Mark Bussin
    Dr Ronel Nienaber
    Economic Growth
    Economy
    Education
    Employee
    Employee Empowerment
    Employee Engagement
    Employee Experience Management
    Employee Performance Management
    Employees
    Employers
    Employment Equity Act
    Equal-pay-for-work-of-equal-value
    Equity
    Executive Bonuses
    Executive Pay
    Executive Remuneration
    Fair Pay
    Female Employees
    Financial And Non Financial Rewards
    Financial And Non-financial Rewards
    Fixed Pay
    Flexibility
    FNB
    Four-day Work Week
    GDP
    Gender Inequality
    Gender Pay Gap
    Generation Z
    Gen Z
    Global Workforce
    Goldfields
    Governance
    Holistic Total Awards
    HR
    Human Recources
    Incentives
    Inequality
    Inflation
    International Mobility
    Janine O’Riley
    Jerry Botha
    Job Retention
    Job Security
    Job Seekers
    Kevan Hawley
    Khokhela Consulting
    Kim Lombard
    King IV
    Kirk Kruger
    Labour Relations Act
    Laurence Grubb
    Lindiwe Sebesho
    Living Wage
    Marie Claire Mclachlan
    Marie-Claire Mclachlan
    Martin Hopkins
    Mental Wellness
    Millennials
    Minimum Wage
    Morag Phillips
    Mr Price Group
    MTN
    Muhammed Goolab
    MultiChoice
    Multi-generational Workforce
    Nazlie Samodien
    Negotiating Salary
    Nicol Mullins
    Openserve
    Parental Leave
    Pay Discrepancies
    Pay Gap
    Peet Kruger
    Performance-based Remuneration
    Performance Management
    Personal Development
    PwC
    RemCo
    Remote Working
    Remuneration
    Remuneration Policies
    Remuneration Resolutions
    Remuneration Voting
    Reward Awards
    Rewards
    Reward Systems
    Salary
    Salary Increase
    Salary Negotiation
    SARA
    SARA Conference 2015
    SARA Conference 2020
    Shareholder Votes
    Skill-based Pay
    Slilled
    South African Reward Association
    Standard Bank
    Talent
    Technology
    Termination Pay
    The South African Reserve Bank
    Total Reward Internship Programme
    Total Reward Package
    Total Rewards Model
    Total Reward Strategy
    UIF
    Vaccination
    Variable Pay
    Wage Freeze
    Wage Negotiations
    WFH
    Women In Business
    Women's Day
    Women's Month 2024
    Workers
    Workforce
    WorldatWork
    World Of Work
    Yolanda Sedlmaier
    Zondo Report
    Zuma

    RSS Feed

CONTACT US

office [at] atthatpoint [dot] co [dot] za
© COPYRIGHT 2025
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • your resources
  • SA Industry News