At That Point
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • your resources
  • SA Industry News

Remuneration is a shareholder issue

24/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Government involvement in executive remuneration will have unintended consequences, says Laurence Grubb, Executive Committee Member at the South African Reward Association (SARA) and Managing Director at Khokhela Consulting.

Executive pay is a perennial hot topic in today’s media, particularly in the context of growing inequality. Unsurprisingly, it has found its way into governance codes like the King Report. There is even talk of governments getting involved in regulating executive pay, presumably in the interests of social cohesion. Whatever the reason, government involvement in what is a private, corporate matter should be vigorously resisted; shareholders have invested their money in a company and it is they who should be controlling how its executives are rewarded, and thus incentivised to perform. 

In cases where governments have attempted to intervene they have backfired. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the European Union imposed a cap on bonuses for bankers. Banks simply increased the guaranteed pay and/or created a new category of variable pay called an “allowance” rather than a “bonus”. This has negatively affected the desired link between performance and reward.

Indeed, corporate governance codes and practices are leading to better solutions to the challenge. While they are perhaps not yet perfect—and may perhaps never be—considerable progress is being made as the business world builds up experience in this area. 

At the outset, it is perhaps worth noting that the common view that all executives are overpaid is simply not true. In fact, many remuneration committees are creating and implementing good remuneration policies which consider all stakeholders. Companies are in business to make a profit, so overpaying executives is hardly likely to appeal to them. 

So what are the current developments in corporate governance aimed at refining remuneration? And what are the issues?

Perhaps the biggest trend—evident in King III and judging from the draft in the King IV™ Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016 issued by the Institute of Directors Southern Africa—is the concept of a shareholder vote on both the remuneration policy and its implementation. There are many variations. In Australia, for example, if a corporate remuneration policy receives a lower-than-75-percent vote at three consecutive AGMs, the board is forced to resign. The most common pattern is for the remuneration policy to be subject to a vote at intervals (two- or three-year intervals are common), with the implementation of the policy the subject of an annual vote. 

Obviously, it is impossible for the implementation vote to be binding—in the very nature of things, employment contracts cannot be delayed until the AGM. However, the question of whether the vote on the remuneration policy should be binding or not remains moot. The King approach has been to make it non-binding, but to make it a requirement for companies to “engage with” those who voted against the policy. 

It might seem that a binding vote on the remuneration policy makes sense, but there is always the risk that a group of minority shareholders could use the vote to further another agenda by effectively expressing a lack of confidence in the board. It may also not necessarily be an effective way to curb excessive executive pay: Switzerland has such a binding vote on remuneration policy, but its CEOs are the best-paid in Europe.

While we do not yet know what the final recommendations of the King IV™ Report, due to be released by the Institute of Directors in Southern Africa on 1 November 2016, will be, it seems certain that South Africa will remain loyal to the principle of a non-binding vote on remuneration policy, probably every two years, but with an obligation to deal with shareholder concerns. On balance, this seems sensible because it keeps the door open to a negotiated solution.

To conclude though, one must highlight a potential issue when it comes to the effectiveness of shareholder voting on such important issues. This is that the bulk of shareholder votes are controlled by third parties, the huge institutions who invest on behalf of individuals. They are often short of resources that are required to analyse policy issues carefully, and they are also not directly concerned with the company in the way that the original type of shareholder was. The original link between the provider of the funds, the board as an agent for the funder and the executives has therefore stretched to the point where some creative thinking is required to bridge this gap. 

This caveat aside, governance standards built on consensus and best practice are most likely to yield results, while regulatory intervention will simply be counterproductive.

ENDS
​

MEDIA CONTACT: Cathlen Fourie, 082 222 9198, [email protected], www.atthatpoint.co.za  

For more information on SARA please visit:
Website: www.sara.co.za  
Twitter: @SA_reward
LinkedIn: South African Reward Association
Facebook: SARA – South African Reward Association ​​​​​​​​​

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Welcome to the SARA newsroom. 

    Archives

    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    March 2023
    February 2023
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Welcome to the South African Reward Association newsroom.

    Categories

    All
    2016 SARA Reward Awards
    2016 South African Reward Association Conference
    2021 SARA Reward Awards
    2024 SARA Reward Awards
    4IR
    ABSA
    Agile Remuneration
    AI
    André Daniels
    Anglo AMerican
    Annual Salary Increase
    Artificial Intelligence
    Benefits
    Board
    Bridgestone
    Career
    Career Growth
    Carmen Arico
    CCMA
    Chris Blair
    Companies Amendment Act 16 Of 2024
    Compensation
    Corruption
    Covid 19
    Covid-19
    Cyber-attacks
    Cybersecurity
    Deon Smit
    Digital
    Disruption
    Diverste Needs
    Dr Mark Bussin
    Dr Ronel Nienaber
    Economic Growth
    Economy
    Education
    Employee
    Employee Empowerment
    Employee Engagement
    Employee Experience Management
    Employee Performance Management
    Employees
    Employers
    Employment Equity Act
    Equal-pay-for-work-of-equal-value
    Equity
    Executive Bonuses
    Executive Pay
    Executive Remuneration
    Fair Pay
    Female Employees
    Financial And Non Financial Rewards
    Financial And Non-financial Rewards
    Fixed Pay
    Flexibility
    FNB
    Four-day Work Week
    GDP
    Gender Inequality
    Gender Pay Gap
    Generation Z
    Global Workforce
    Goldfields
    Governance
    Holistic Total Awards
    HR
    Human Recources
    Incentives
    Inequality
    Inflation
    International Mobility
    Jerry Botha
    Job Retention
    Job Security
    Job Seekers
    Kevan Hawley
    Khokhela Consulting
    Kim Lombard
    King IV
    Kirk Kruger
    Labour Relations Act
    Laurence Grubb
    Lindiwe Sebesho
    Living Wage
    Marie Claire Mclachlan
    Marie-Claire Mclachlan
    Martin Hopkins
    Mental Wellness
    Millennials
    Minimum Wage
    Morag Phillips
    Mr Price Group
    MTN
    Muhammed Goolab
    MultiChoice
    Multi-generational Workforce
    Nazlie Samodien
    Negotiating Salary
    Nicol Mullins
    Openserve
    Parental Leave
    Pay Discrepancies
    Pay Gap
    Peet Kruger
    Performance-based Remuneration
    Performance Management
    Personal Development
    PwC
    RemCo
    Remote Working
    Remuneration
    Remuneration Policies
    Remuneration Resolutions
    Remuneration Voting
    Reward Awards
    Rewards
    Reward Systems
    Salary
    Salary Increase
    Salary Negotiation
    SARA
    SARA Conference 2015
    SARA Conference 2020
    Shareholder Votes
    Skill-based Pay
    Slilled
    South African Reward Association
    Standard Bank
    Talent
    Technology
    Termination Pay
    The South African Reserve Bank
    Total Reward Internship Programme
    Total Reward Package
    Total Rewards Model
    Total Reward Strategy
    UIF
    Vaccination
    Variable Pay
    Wage Freeze
    Wage Negotiations
    WFH
    Women In Business
    Women's Day
    Women's Month 2024
    Workers
    Workforce
    WorldatWork
    World Of Work
    Yolanda Sedlmaier
    Zondo Report
    Zuma

    RSS Feed

CONTACT US

office [at] atthatpoint [dot] co [dot] za
© COPYRIGHT 2024
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  • home
  • our story
  • our services
  • your resources
  • SA Industry News